Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
 
2
 
3
Project Team
4
Innerbelt Bridge Subcommittee
  • May 4, 2006 Typical Criteria / Bridge Types / Rendering Views


  • June 1, 2006 Initial Criteria / Initial Concepts


  • June 7, 2006 Public Meeting 1. Bridge Type Selection Process / Initial Concepts


  • June 28, 2006 Context Sensitive Design Workshop / Bridge Tour


  • July 20, 2006 Public Feedback /  Design Principles / Goal Statement


  • August 17, 2006 Final Design Principles and Goal Statement/Feasible Alternatives


  • September 7, 2006 Refined Final Alternatives


  • September 13, 2006 Public Meeting 2. Final Alternatives


  • October 5, 2006 Recommend Preferred Alternative
5
Timeline of Meetings
6
Innerbelt Bridge Subcommittee
  • Recommend a bridge type to ODOT at
  • October 5, 2006 Subcommittee Meeting
7
Public Input
8
Innerbelt Project Update
9
Central Viaduct Bridge Site
10
Project Budget

  • Construction Group 1
    •  Current Construction Budget = $297M (2010$)


    •  Final Alternatives Range from Approximately $315M
    •   to $334M (2010$) for Entire Construction Group
      • (5% - 12% over current budget)
11
Bridge Type Selection Update
  • Goal Statement and Design Principles


  • Bridge Context


  • Final Bridge Type Alternatives
    • Technical Considerations
    • Possible Variations
    • Visual Impact
12
Goal Statement
13
Design Principles
14
Design Principles
15
Design Principles
16
Design Principles
17
Bridge Context
18
Characteristics of Site
19
Characteristics of Site
20
Characteristics of Site
21
Characteristics of Site
  • Consistent Theme – Concrete Supporting Steel
22
Characteristics of Site
23
Slope Stability and Geotechnical Conditions
  • Slope Stability Analysis
  • Piers Can Be Founded on West Slope
  • Shorter Main Span Across River (Approx. 450 ft.)
24
West Slope Remediation and Regrading
25
Final Alternate 1 – Steel Tied Arch
26
Final Alternate 1 – Steel Tied Arch
27
Final Alternate 1 – Steel Tied Arch
28
Final Alternate 1 – Steel Tied Arch
29
Final Alternate 2 – Two Tower Cable Stay
30
Final Alternate 2 – Two Tower Cable Stay
31
Final Alternate 2 – Two Tower Cable Stay
32
Final Alternate 2 – Two Tower Cable Stay
33
Final Alternate 3 – Single Tower Cable Stay
34
Final Alternate 3 – Single Tower Cable Stay
35
Final Alternate 3 – Single Tower Cable Stay
36
Other Concepts Considered
37
Final Alternate 3 – Single Tower Cable Stay
38
Approach Spans
39
Approach Spans
40
Approach Spans
41
Approach Spans
42
Approach Spans
43
Visual Impact - Abbey Road looking Southeast
44
Visual Impact - Abbey Road looking Southeast
45
Visual Impact - Abbey Road looking Southeast
46
Visual Impact - Abbey Road looking Southeast
47
Visual Impact - Abbey Road looking North
48
Visual Impact - Abbey Road looking North
49
Visual Impact - Abbey Road looking North
50
Visual Impact - Abbey Road looking North
51
Visual Impact - Southside Patio
52
Visual Impact - Southside Patio
53
Visual Impact - Southside Patio
54
Visual Impact - Southside Patio
55
Visual Impact - West 14th Looking East
56
Visual Impact - West 14th Looking East
57
Visual Impact - West 14th Looking East
58
Visual Impact - West 14th Looking East
59
Visual Impact - University Road looking North
60
Visual Impact - University Road looking North
61
Visual Impact - University Road looking North
62
Visual Impact - University Road looking North
63
Visual Impact –Greek Orthodox Church
64
Visual Impact –Greek Orthodox Church
65
Visual Impact –Greek Orthodox Church
66
Visual Impact –Greek Orthodox Church
67
Visual Impact – University Avenue Panoramic
68
Visual Impact – University Avenue Panoramic
69
Visual Impact – University Avenue Panoramic
70
Visual Impact – University Avenue Panoramic
71
Open Discussion
  • Thank You for Your Attention
  • and Input!